Let me tell you about the weirdest day of my professional life. Last month, I found myself standing in the fluorescent-lit menswear section of a suburban Walmart at 7:30 AM on a Tuesday, wearing what my girlfriend calls my “incognito but make it fashion” outfit – a baseball cap pulled low, plain white tee, and jeans that cost more than most people’s monthly clothing budget. I was stuffing $12.88 George brand chinos into a shopping cart alongside three different Hanes multipack tees while furiously taking notes on my phone. An older employee gave me the side-eye, clearly suspecting I was either shoplifting or having some kind of breakdown. I almost showed her my website to prove I was “working,” but somehow explaining that I was a menswear journalist doing a comparative analysis of mass market basics seemed even more suspicious.
Two hours later, I was repeating the same bizarre ritual at Target, this time accumulating a cart full of Goodfellow & Co. items while a mother with twin toddlers watched me hold the same henley in navy and burgundy up to my face for a solid three minutes. “The burgundy brings out your undertones better,” she finally said, before pushing her cart away. God bless the honesty of strangers in Target.
The great American mass-market menswear experiment had begun. Why was I doing this? Well, I’d gotten like forty-seven DMs in the past month asking essentially the same question: “Dude, I’m broke but need to look decent – Target or Walmart for basics?” It’s a fair question. We all know neither store is producing heirloom-quality garments, but when your budget is tight and you need that new work shirt tomorrow, you make compromises. And honestly? The price difference between the most basic mall brands and these mass-market giants has gotten so extreme lately that even guys with comfortable incomes are wandering these aisles wondering if there’s hidden gold among the polyester blend mountains.
I’ve spent years writing about $400 Japanese selvedge denim and hand-finished dress shoes from small Italian workshops. My closet has more than a few pieces that made my accountant visibly wince during tax season. But one of my most-worn items is a simple navy cotton sweater I found at Target four years ago for $24.99 that has inexplicably outlasted merino wool versions triple its price. So I know there are gems hiding in plain sight – you just need to know what to look for and when to walk away.
The haul from my retail adventure sat in my apartment for two weeks, subjected to what my friends now call “The Reed Protocol” – wear-testing everything through multiple wash cycles, stress-testing seams, evaluating comfort after a full day’s wear, and the ultimate test: whether I’d actually reach for it again once the experiment was over. My girlfriend almost moved out when she came home to find me wearing a Walmart graphic tee with a $1,200 sport coat, but sacrifices must be made for journalistic integrity, you know?
Let’s start with what Target’s Goodfellow & Co. line gets surprisingly right: outerwear and knits. Their sweaters, particularly the cotton-blend crews and cardigans, have no business being as good as they are for $25-30. The weight is substantial, the fit is modern without being aggressively slim, and they hold up remarkably well in the wash if you ignore the care instructions asking for flat-drying (who has space for that in a New York apartment?) and just tumble dry on low. Their denim jackets and shirt jackets (or “shackets” if you insist on using that word, which I refuse to do regularly) often nail that sweet spot of looking like they cost twice as much. The secret seems to be in their color selection – slightly muted, sophisticated hues rather than primary-color brightness that screams “bargain bin.”
Walmart’s George and Time and Tru brands, meanwhile, dominate in the basics department – specifically underwear, socks, and workout gear. Their pima cotton boxer briefs ($14 for a three-pack) held up better after multiple washes than similar options at Target, and their athletic socks ($8 for a six-pack) maintained elasticity longer than competitors twice the price. The plain tees, especially the slightly thicker ones in their “premium” line, are genuinely competitive with brands charging three times as much. They’re not quite at that magical Uniqlo Supima cotton level, but they’re shockingly close for about half the price.
Where Target stumbles: dress shirts and pants. Despite Goodfellow’s generally solid reputation, their button-ups have some fit issues I just can’t get past. The collars tend to do this weird ripply thing after the first wash, and the fabric on most of their “dressy” pieces feels noticeably synthetic even when the cotton percentage is high. Their chinos start out promising but bag out dramatically at the knees after a single day’s wear. I tested their straight fit khaki against a Walmart George version of almost identical price – by lunchtime, the Target pants had developed that deflated balloon look around my knees while the Walmart ones maintained their shape better (though neither would pass close inspection in a professional environment).
Walmart’s weakest category is anything attempting to be on-trend. Their attempts at copying current styles – like the “work leisure” quarter-zips or those mock-vintage graphic tees with faux-distressing – have that unmistakable “how do you do, fellow kids?” energy. The proportions are always slightly off, with sleeves that hit at weird lengths or collars that sit awkwardly. The colors also tend toward the aggressively bright or strangely muddy with very little in between. The exception is their plain layering pieces, which can be surprisingly solid if you’re willing to try on multiple sizes to find the right fit.
The accessories at both stores deserve special mention. Target’s Goodfellow belts, particularly the braided elastic ones and simple leather options, look substantially more expensive than they are. Their sunglasses are also a hidden treasure – I’ve had $12 Target wayfarers that people assumed were Ray-Bans until they got close enough to see the branding. Walmart, meanwhile, has quietly developed a respectable collection of leather goods – their basic brown belt ($17.99) has survived regular wear for months without the dreaded cracking or peeling that usually dooms budget leather.
One category where brand loyalty makes absolutely zero sense? T-shirts. After blind wear-testing plain white tees from both retailers alongside a $45 “premium basics” version from a brand that shall remain unnamed, I literally couldn’t tell the difference after two washes. The fabric weight was nearly identical, and while the expensive one had slightly nicer finishing on the seams, it actually developed a small hole faster than either mass-market option. When a friend stopped by during this test, I made him close his eyes and feel all three shirts – he confidently identified the expensive one as “probably the cheap one” and the $8 Walmart tee as “definitely the nice one.” Fashion is weird sometimes.
Temperature plays a factor here too – both retailers mysteriously excel at opposite ends of the seasonal spectrum. Target’s fall/winter pieces generally outperform their summer offerings, with surprisingly decent sweaters, flannels, and lightweight jackets that hold up well. Walmart’s strength lies in summer basics – their performance polos and moisture-wicking tees stand up to heat and humidity better than Target’s equivalents, which tend to get that dreaded “permanent sweat stain” look much faster.
The biggest difference between the two, honestly, isn’t even the clothes themselves but the shopping experience. Target has invested heavily in store lighting and display that makes their Goodfellow line look legitimately premium at first glance. The mannequins are styled in a way that suggests “affordable but intentional” rather than just “cheap.” Walmart’s menswear section, bless their hearts, still has that unmistakable fluorescent harshness that makes everything look slightly worse than it actually is. I’ve purchased identical plain tees from both stores and consistently found that friends rate the Target version higher when they see it in the store but can’t tell the difference once the tags are removed. Retail psychology is a hell of a drug.
My very professional, very scientific testing revealed one last crucial difference: Target wins the “passing glance test” while Walmart wins the “long-term value test.” Meaning: Target clothes look better on the rack and for the first few wears, but Walmart basics often outlast them with repeated washing and wearing. If you need something that looks nice for a specific occasion or only occasional wear, Target’s your better bet. If you need something that can handle being in your regular rotation and frequent washing, Walmart’s offerings often edge ahead in durability.
So what’s the final verdict? If I had $100 to refresh my casual wardrobe and had to choose one store, I’d probably go with Target – their overall aesthetic and fit aligns better with contemporary style, and the shopping experience doesn’t make me feel like I’m in a dystopian nightmare. But the smart play is actually to cherry-pick from both: Walmart for tees, underwear, socks and workout gear; Target for sweaters, jackets, and anything you’d wear to a casual dinner with friends.
The $24.99 Target sweater that started this whole investigation is still in my rotation four years later, outlasting pieces ten times its price. And those Walmart pima cotton boxer briefs? They’re quietly taking over my underwear drawer because they’re holding up better than the fancy ones with the designer waistband. The menswear world is full of surprises if you’re willing to look past the label snobbery. Just maybe don’t tell the PR people at those luxury brands I write about that I sometimes wear Walmart boxer briefs to their fashion week events. Some industry secrets are better kept under wraps – or under my pants, as it were.
Leave a Reply